Wynyard Quarter Attracts & Detracts

Talk about people places.... Take a bow Auckland.... Take a bow Auckland Regional Council, Auckland City Council, and Sea + City. You take credit for the years of decisions, allocations, and planning that underpin the public legacy we can all enjoy at Wynyard Quarter.

The place attracts and caters for young people. Youth who might only be seen on the waterfront for an event at the Vector Arena. Wynyard Quarter attracts Auckland's youth. The tip of the iceberg of the latent demand that exists in the resident population of 1.4 million people for a public place like this.

They share the playground with kids of all ages. A place to hang out. In the public eye. Informal surveillance. Safe. This photo was taken from the gantry view platform. Inspired I guess. Everybody wants an elevated view of places that attract people. Great for photos and for perspective.

This Chinese delegation from Xinjiang enjoyed their visit. This informal - but somehow formal - seating is inspired. And as the trees grow providing welcome shade across this area, it will attract those who want to sit and watch the world go by. The piano was regularly used...

The WindTree scultpture provided the backdrop for any number of photos, as did the trams looping the Wynyard Loop.

The choice of food and eatery is extensive, from a pot of chips at Sanfords to more exotic fare. Spoiled for choice. Great to have a waterfront place that does not feel like lager alley. Feels safe. Good family fare. Everybody's here (the public toilets are still unfinished though. Very important for young and old. Key to success. Just having one in the container sculpture may not meet requirements...)

Swing from food to walk to swing.

Then there are the fishing boats and the sea gulls. These are the places to sit, take photos, have a snack, and generally chill out. But wait. Something's not quite right. Pan a bit right....

What are all these cars doing here? Not a parking warden in sight. Certainly no sign saying no parking. And none permitting it. More than a few students have remarked to me about the way car parking is already damaging the public experience on Wynyard Quarter. The better the day - the more the informal car-parking is damaging the experience....

The great pictures are cluttered by cars. Sure this is a working waterfront. On my way here, as I biked to and from the ferry, I couldn't help but notice the security guards: "please get off your bike sir..." And of course I did. So where are they when you really need them? Where's one asking, "no parking here sir - unless you need to unload for a fishing boat..." Or something like that.

The wonderful Heritage Net Shed frontage was also stacked with cars. For ages. No evidence of loading or unloading. Someone told me that everyone's being a bit relaxed while things get going. Not a good idea. Bad parking habits get locked in very quickly. The planning for this place was that around - only - 10% of all trips in and out would be by car. The rest by other means. The great design as at risk of being compromised by those in charge of implementation. That's Auckland Council. You need to fix this now.

And here's another place where cars park all day. Unticketed. This is a great public space, an open space, a place for walking and informal being. Not a place for cars. Move them on. Put a couple of security guards here.

They might look cute in the garage, and they might be safe parked here, close to work, so I can keep a watch, and not walk too far. This is the sort of attitude that has completely buggered Princes Wharf for the public. These parking patterns must be nipped in the bud. This is a shared space. But it's not a space that needs to be shared with parked cars. That was never part of the plan.

These are mostly contractor vehicles. This is the argument that will be made in support of car-parking. The thin end of the wedge. In fact we all know that Wynyard Quarter will be a building site for at least a decade. At the same time it will be a fishing port. And a people's place. Parking - for visitors, contractors, and workers alike - must be robustly controlled. Look in the top left of this picture for example. Empty space. How about a bit of parking space there for contractor vehicles? Get this sorted Auckland Council. Don't wait till after RWC. I don't want to end on a sour note. Wynyard Quarter is off to a great and popular start. We can be proud of this achievement. So here's a challenge for the new Auckland Council and its new Waterfront Development Agency. I challenge you to do the same - or better - on Queens Wharf. That will be your waterfront legacy.

Sea + City and Wynyard Quarter to emphasise maritime heritage

One of the big worries I have had, along with Councillor Coney, and also Auckland's heritage maritime industry - is over the extent to which maritime heritage and history and all that stuff, would be provided for in the planning for Wynyard Quarter / Tankfarm.

There have been lots of glossy pictures and artistic representations, photos of harbour piles and rusty chains and old railway lines. But what did these images really mean on the ground, in the water and in your face - for the redevelopment.

I noticed that the carefully prepared Urban Design Framework for Wynyard Quarter, prepared by Sea + City, and agreed by Auckland Regional Council, actually made no mention of heritage at all. I've advocated for this aspect at meetings, and so has Cllr Coney and others, but somehow this matter has not been properly resolved. This means a risk that Sea + City will not sense any strong direction in that regard.

That has now been fixed. At last week's Transport & Urban Development Ctte, ARC formally considered Sea + City's interesting designs for Precinct One of Wynyard Quarter. I prepared some detailed resolutions about heritage for this meeting, and these were unanimously adopted by ARC. The ARC has resolved, the following, and I draw your attention specifically to (d):

B.1 WYNYARD QUARTER PRECINCT PLAN 1
D160-02-14 & D160-W03
Committee Secretary: 10 June 2009
An addendum to ‘B1’ previously circulated to councillors from Mr Hugh Jarvis, was handed out. (Attachment 1). Mr John Dalzell of Sea + City presented the powerpoint slides on the draft precinct plan for Wynyard Quarter.
RESOLVED
a) That the report be received.
b) That the committee acknowledges that it has been consulted on the draft precinct plan Wynyard Quarter Precinct Plan 1 Version 6 May 2009 for the Jellicoe Precinct by Sea + City Projects Limited on behalf of Auckland Regional Holdings.
c) That, subject to any other matters that the committee decides, it endorses the draft precinct plan Wynyard Quarter Precinct Plan 1 Version 6 May 2009 for
the Jellicoe Precinct :
i) excluding the depiction of a future building extending over the coastal marine area from development site 12
ii) but noting the challenges with the inclusion of a stormwater pond or wetland in the public open space north of Jellicoe Street and west of Brigham Street.
d) That the committee advise ARH and Sea + City of its expectations in regard to planning for the protection and enhancement of maritime heritage and
waterfront character of Wynyard Quarter, including:
i) that maritime heritage and waterfront character is a principle of the Urban Design Framework for Wynyard Quarter.
ii) that maritime heritage and waterfront character need to be protected and enhanced to the maximum extent possible, alongside other principles in the Urban Design Framework.
iii) that the Wynyard Quarter Precinct Plan 1 includes: a variety of provisions and opportunities for the expression of Wynyard Quarter’s history and stories; provision for the heritage fleet.

This is an excellent result.
It provides for clear direction to Sea + City and Auckland Regional Holdings.
And it provides direction that the design must "provide for the heritage fleet".

ARC's waterfront development objectives changed

This is a big one for me. I've been working on this issue for three years. You might think the result doesn't go far enough - but believe me - it will make a difference.

Before I go on more, this blog is about Wynyard Quarter / Western Reclamation / Tank Farm redevelopment. A central chunk of Auckland's waterfront. My issue with what has been proposed is that ARH (Auckland Regional Holdings) have been instructed by ARC to "...optimise revenue..." from the development. Those directions also go on about the development being "...world class..." without saying anything about the nature or purpose of any development.

Last week, ARC's Finance Ctte voted this way:

That the Chairman of the Finance Committee writes to Auckland Regional Holdings:

(i) requesting Auckland Regional Holdings to address any inconsistencies
in the draft 2009-19 Long Term Funding Plan, and to confirm that it will
provide the distributions specified in the Auckland Regional Council’s
2009-19 Long Term Council Community Plan.
(ii) requesting Auckland Regional Holdings to keep the Auckland Regional
Council fully informed of its leasing strategy for the Wynyard quarter,
and related financial implications;
(iii) advising that the previous objective in respect of the waterfront
investment property “to enable the creation of a world-class, mixed-use,
urban waterfront redevelopment incorporating high-quality and
accessible public spaces and high-quality private works” is amended to
“to enable the creation of a world-class, mixed-use, urban waterfront
redevelopment that becomes a visitor destination by delivering high quality
and accessible public spaces and attractions alongside high quality
private works”.

I moved the change that is in (iii) above. You might have to read it a couple of times to spot the difference. But this change should make a significant difference. It provides direction to ARH and Sea+City about the purpose of the development, and what needs to be provided to meet that purpose.

Greywacke pebbles on the beach south of Timaru. I like beaches and flotsam and jetsam...