![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
SOS Queens Wharf Save Our Sheds |
Sign their petition at: http://www.sosqueenswharf.co.nz/ Go to Facebook, and check out their page: SOS Queens Wharf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
We need to think hard before doing anything permanent that will detract from the promise and the potential of the "peoples' wharf".... |
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Queens Wharf Opens on Anzac Day
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Queens Wharf Opens on Anzac Day
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
SOS Queens Wharf Save Our Sheds |
Sign their petition at: http://www.sosqueenswharf.co.nz/ Go to Facebook, and check out their page: SOS Queens Wharf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
We need to think hard before doing anything permanent that will detract from the promise and the potential of the "peoples' wharf".... |
1 comment:
- Anonymous said...
-
Heritage?
Dear Mr. Cayford,
I usually agree with most of your views regarding urban issues and development in Auckland, but the whole sheds debacle is something that I don't agree on.
Just because Auckland bowled over most of its heritage buildings in the 80's, it doesnt mean we have to protect every little corrugated iron shed because somehow its 'heritgae' since it was built in 1910 whatever. The two sheds are ugly and have no architectural features whatsoever.
As quoted by someone else:
"It is folly to assume one can correct Aucklands past of heritage destruction, by holding onto two sheds just for the sake of appearing to be a guardian of heritage. Its too little to late and merely smacks of window dressing. They have little or nor architectural merit in their present setting, and although many old sheds have been incorporated into existing successful waterfronts all over the world (including Auckland's very own North Wharf), no one has been able to come up with some design that includes the sheds that has any WOW factor - that says "Yes we want that!". It is all very wishy washy, and people are taking a stance for stances sake and not with the sheds best interests at heart. Dismantle and use them elswhere, but Queens Wharf needs something new."
I agree. -
April 29, 2010 at 1:44 AM
1 comment:
Heritage?
Dear Mr. Cayford,
I usually agree with most of your views regarding urban issues and development in Auckland, but the whole sheds debacle is something that I don't agree on.
Just because Auckland bowled over most of its heritage buildings in the 80's, it doesnt mean we have to protect every little corrugated iron shed because somehow its 'heritgae' since it was built in 1910 whatever. The two sheds are ugly and have no architectural features whatsoever.
As quoted by someone else:
"It is folly to assume one can correct Aucklands past of heritage destruction, by holding onto two sheds just for the sake of appearing to be a guardian of heritage. Its too little to late and merely smacks of window dressing. They have little or nor architectural merit in their present setting, and although many old sheds have been incorporated into existing successful waterfronts all over the world (including Auckland's very own North Wharf), no one has been able to come up with some design that includes the sheds that has any WOW factor - that says "Yes we want that!". It is all very wishy washy, and people are taking a stance for stances sake and not with the sheds best interests at heart. Dismantle and use them elswhere, but Queens Wharf needs something new."
I agree.
Post a Comment