tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1763366316092865103.post4439941562455609429..comments2023-08-26T01:09:07.337+12:00Comments on Reflections on Auckland Planning: ARC's Clear Conflict of Interest at Queens WharfJoel Cayfordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18333945842340425946noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1763366316092865103.post-83335689654638678632010-04-21T13:38:55.137+12:002010-04-21T13:38:55.137+12:00This will be a disaster for the waterfront, short ...This will be a disaster for the waterfront, short term thinking for short term gain. What is there for Aucklanders in the long term? Our heritage buildings will be lost, there will be no reminders of our trading past. Gentrification and modernisation is not the answer here. ARC have betrayed the citizens it represents. How are the RMA preoceeses for gaining consent being applied so quickly?cola14https://www.blogger.com/profile/13696791658849576126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1763366316092865103.post-2881258295095042172010-04-21T10:06:29.352+12:002010-04-21T10:06:29.352+12:00Sounds like a perfect case for gazettal under the ...Sounds like a perfect case for gazettal under the Historic Places Trust, whereby post-1900 "archaeological sites" can be protected, such as what occured with the Napier Prison wall.<br /><br />The process is described here at http://www.historic.org.nz/ProtectingOurHeritage/Archaeology/Gazettal.aspx<br /><br />No form, just contact archaeologist@historic.org.nz to propose the sheds and Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com